Automotive Turnaround Programs: Improving Cash Flow

ByIvo Schmincke,Dr. Ing. Marc Heinisch,Bastian Imhof,Niklas Ruhkamp
Time to read: 5 minutesAutomotive, Article
// Overview

Rising costs, volatile markets, structural overcapacity, and declining sales volumes require OEMs and suppliers to consistently refine their cost structures, processes, and control mechanisms. However, traditional cost-cutting programs often fall short in this regard: while they can yield short-term savings, they fail to address the underlying causes of profitability and efficiency issues. What is therefore needed is an integrated approach that combines short-term impact on EBIT and cash flow with sustainable operational improvement.

Why traditional savings plans often reach their limits

Many industrial companies initially respond to economic pressure with across-the-board cost cuts or isolated, one-off measures. However, the impact is often limited or disappears after only a short time because these measures fail to address the key drivers of earnings and cash flow.

Common causes include:

  • Lack of transparency regarding profit and cash flow drivers
  • Isolated optimization initiatives without integrated overall management
  • Focus on short-term savings rather than structural improvements to the cost base, processes, and performance
  • Across-the-board reduction of personnel and operating costs without adapting the organization and processes
  • Lack of prioritization based on impact on earnings, liquidity effect, feasibility, and risk
  • Too slow implementation of critical measures and lack of consistency in controlling

The result: the cost base is reduced only superficially. At the same time, new inefficiencies, quality risks, or operational instability arise. Savings evaporate, fixed costs remain, and structural profitability issues resurface after a short time. Often, the next program follows after 18 to 24 months, with declining acceptance within the organization and limited impact on competitiveness.

Our conclusion: Sustainable improvements in earnings can only be achieved when cost reduction and operational performance improvements are considered together. This requires transparency regarding the true drivers of earnings, clear prioritization, consistent implementation, and structural adjustments. In this way, efficiency, quality, and delivery capability can be strengthened on a lasting basis.

Where is the greatest potential for earnings and cash flow?

The greatest potential rarely lies in just one area. What matters is taking a holistic view of the entire value chain and prioritizing based on the impact on results.

Key areas of focus include:

Material Costs and Procurement

In procurement in particular, there is often potential for quick gains through:

  • Consolidating purchasing volumes
  • Renegotiating with suppliers
  • Design-to-cost and value engineering approaches
  • Reducing product variants and complexity
  • Optimizing make-or-buy decisions

Depending on the initial situation, material costs can often be 
reduced by 3-8%.

Production and Operations

In production, the focus is particularly on productivity, stability, and efficiency.

Relevant measures include:

  • Increasing equipment availability (OEE)
  • Reducing scrap and rework
  • Optimizing workforce allocation and capacity models
  • Improving indirect productivity
  • Stabilizing critical manufacturing and startup processes

Viele Unternehmen erzielen hier Produktivitätssteigerungen von 10–15 % innerhalb weniger Monate.

Working Capital and Cash Flow

In addition to profitability, the focus is increasingly shifting toward ensuring liquidity.

Key areas of focus include:

  • Reducing inventory levels throughout the entire supply chain
  • Reducing safety stock and obsolete inventory
  • Improving the quality of forecasting, planning, and scheduling
  • Optimizing payment terms with customers and suppliers
  • Shortening accounts receivable collection periods

Working capital programs often enable inventory reductions of 10-20% and generate additional liquidity in the short term.

Production Network and Footprint

Structural measures become particularly important in the face of overcapacity or changing market demands:

  • Consolidation of locations
  • Relocation of production operations
  • Alignment of capacity with actual demand
  • Optimization of capacity utilization and vertical integration

How can potential be reliably identified within a few weeks?

Many companies lose valuable time due to lengthy analysis phases, a lack of transparency, or lists of measures that are not properly prioritized. A pragmatic approach that provides quick transparency and clear guidance is therefore essential.

Our cost-reduction program is based on three key principles.

1. Providing Transparency on Key Value Drivers

The process begins with a systematic analysis of cost, production, and cash flow structures. The goal is to quickly identify the key drivers of profitability.

These include, among other things:

  • Analysis of cost and overhead structures
  • Assessment of production and process performance
  • Identification of operational weaknesses and inefficiencies
  • Benchmarking of efficiency and productivity
  • Quantification of financial potential

The focus is not only on costs, but also on the impact on EBIT, liquidity, and operational stability.

2. Prioritize Measures Based on Their Impact and Feasibility

Not every measure produces a relevant effect in the short term. That is why initiatives are systematically evaluated in terms of:

  • Impact on results
  • Impact on cash flow
  • Feasibility
  • Investment requirements
  • Time to impact
  • Risks and dependencies

The result is a portfolio of measures tailored to the specific business situation, with clear responsibilities and a robust implementation roadmap.

3. Ensure Consistent Implementation

Successful programs rarely fail due to a lack of ideas, but rather due to poor implementation.

Key success factors are therefore:

  • clear governance and PMO structures
  • KPI-based management
  • Regular management reviews
  • Transparent tracking of actions
  • Consistent monitoring of the impact on results

Measures with measurable short-term effects

Speed is especially important in high-pressure situations. Companies need measures that produce visible results in terms of earnings and liquidity within a few weeks.

The following are often particularly effective:

  • Purchasing and renegotiation initiatives
  • Reduction of indirect costs
  • Adjustment of external capacities
  • Inventory reduction and working capital measures
  • Prioritization of profitable product lines
  • Stabilization of critical production processes
  • Improvement of planning and control processes

Many of these measures begin to have a measurable impact on EBIT and cash flow within the first 8–12 weeks.

It is crucial that short-term savings not come at the expense of quality, delivery reliability, or long-term viability.

What factors ensure sustainable competitiveness?

Following short-term stabilization, the focus is now on improving long-term performance.

Goal: to make the organization more efficient, resilient, and manageable in the long term.

Operational Excellence in Manufacturing

Sustainable efficiency gains are based on standardized processes, consistent shop floor management, data-driven performance management, and robust planning and control processes. Combined with systematic problem-solving, companies create the conditions for lasting increases in productivity and performance.

Reducing Complexity

Growing product variety and long-established structures lead to significant inefficiencies in many companies. Successful companies reduce complexity by streamlining product portfolios, optimizing administrative processes, and establishing clear end-to-end responsibilities. This reduces interfaces and accelerates decision-making.

Management and Organizational Models

Sustainable improvement requires transparency and clear responsibilities. KPI-based management systems, transparent performance dialogues, and integrated management of operations and finance create the foundation for the consistent implementation of measures and sustainable improvement in results.

Effective turnaround management combines operational improvement with financial management, thereby creating sustainable competitiveness.

Combining short-term and structural measures

A successful transformation or turnaround program combines rapid analysis with consistent implementation.

Phase 1: Scoping and Potential Analysis (approx. 4–6 weeks)
  • Analysis of cost, production, and cash flow structures
  • Identification of key performance drivers
  • Quantification of potential
  • Prioritization of measures
  • Development of a robust roadmap
Phase 2: Implementation and Performance Improvement (approx. 3–6 months)
  • Achieving quick wins in the short term
  • Stabilizing operational processes
  • Implementing structural improvements
  • Management through KPIs and PMO structures
  • Ensuring the long-term implementation of measures
Supporting: Communication and Stakeholder Management
  • Development of a clear communication strategy
  • Engagement of relevant internal and external stakeholders
  • Support for critical decisions and milestones
  • Ensuring acceptance and the speed of implementation

Programs that take a holistic view of procurement, operations, production, and the supply chains are more successful than isolated individual initiatives.

Conclusion: Lasting improvement in earnings requires more than just cost-cutting

The challenges facing the automotive industry are not going to disappear anytime soon. This makes it all the more important to adopt an approach that quickly establishes transparency, consistently prioritizes operational levers, and effectively implements measures.

An integrated turnaround program not only improves earnings and cash flow in the short term but also strengthens competitiveness, resilience, and operational excellence in the long term. Together with our clients, we develop turnaround programs tailored to the company’s specific challenges and support them from implementation through to measurable results.

Here’s what our turnaround programs have achieved in client projects:

Shorter Turnaround Times 
Higher OEE
Lower Quality Costs
Lower Structural Costs
EBITDA Growth

Achieving a
turnaround
program together

// CONTACT US NOW

Are you looking to identify opportunities for improving earnings and cash flow, or to launch a turnaround or performance improvement program?

We help OEMs and suppliers quickly identify opportunities, develop customized action plans, and achieve sustainable results in production, procurement, and the supply chain. From strategy to implementation. 

Restructuring in the
automotive sector

Financial restructuring involves more than just securing liquidity. Read our latest publication to learn how companies can gain timely insight into their liquidity and financing needs and lay the groundwork for a successful restructuring.

Get insights now

//About the authors

//You might also be interested in

09. June 2026
Restructuring in the Automotive Sector: Securing the Ability to Take Action
Financial Restructuring in the Automotive Industry. Secure Liquidity and Stabilize Financing. Learn More!
Read more
11. May 2026
Project Delays Put Pressure on Profit Margins in the Automotive Industry
Project delays are putting pressure on profit margins in the automotive industry. Discover the measures that can help companies respond effectively.
Read more
13. April 2026
Automotive Suppliers in Crisis
Restructuring at Automotive Suppliers: How Banks Manage Risks, Secure Liquidity, and Create Sustainable Value Through Operational Leverage.
Read more